Sardine | Fraud ROI: Why growth and security belong together

Fraud ROI: Why growth and security belong together

Published: 2022-05-16T00:00:00Z

Fraud ROI shows why growth, customer experience, and security should work together. Learn how fraud leaders win buy-in without slowing the business now.

Guest: Gil Rosenthal Today I’m talking with Gil Rosenthal about something fraud teams end up explaining over and over again, and usually to the same audience. Leadership. More specifically, the idea that fraud is just a cost of doing business, or that growth and security somehow have to compete with each other.
I do not buy that. Gil does not either.
Because when a company treats fraud like an unavoidable tax on growth, what it is usually doing is accepting preventable losses, preventable customer friction, and preventable trust damage. That is not a growth strategy. That is a visibility problem. It just sounds more acceptable in a boardroom.
And that matters.
In this conversation, Gil and I get into fraud ROI, fraud leadership communication, and the bigger challenge of helping executives understand that customer experience and fraud are not opposites. In fact, the strongest companies usually get both right together. The weaker ones tend to believe they have to sacrifice one for the other. That usually does not end well.

Here is what that means in practice:

What you’ll hear in this episode:

You should listen to this episode if you:

Episode notes & key takeaways

This episode gets into one of the most common frustrations fraud fighters have, which is trying to explain that fraud prevention is not just about loss reduction. It is also about enabling a better business. A healthier customer experience. Better decisions. Better growth. Better trust. That is the conversation Gil and I wanted to have here.

Why fraud ROI gets misunderstood in leadership conversations

Let’s break this down. A lot of executives say they care about fraud until the conversation turns into budget, friction, or approval rates. Then suddenly the framing changes. Fraud becomes “a cost of doing business.” As if the only real options are accept the losses or slow everything down.
That is a false choice. Fraud ROI gets misunderstood because too many companies measure fraud value too narrowly. They look at chargebacks. Maybe direct loss. Maybe manual review cost. But they miss the downstream effects. Customer churn after account takeover. Bad support experiences. Lost trust. Operational drag. Higher dispute rates. Internal firefighting. All of that is part of the ROI story too.
And that matters.

Why fraud is not cost of doing business

Here’s what’s actually happening. When leaders say fraud is just a cost of doing business, what they usually mean is they do not yet see a better alternative clearly enough. That does not make the statement true. It just means the organization has not done enough work to connect fraud decisions to real business consequences.
Because fraud is not some harmless background expense. It affects customer experience. It affects margin. It affects trust. It affects reputation. And if it gets bad enough, it affects the entire way the company operates. So no, I do not think fraud is just a cost of doing business. I think unmanaged fraud is a cost of underestimating the problem.
That is a very different thing.

What growth and security actually look like together

This is where things get interesting. Gil and I talk about how online companies can feel like either a shopping mall or an amusement park, and that analogy works because it gets at something deeper. The best experiences do not just remove friction randomly. They create an environment where legitimate customers feel comfortable, guided, and protected. That is not anti-growth. That is smart design. A lot of leaders still hear “security” and picture more barriers. But good secure growth strategy is not about making everything harder. It is about using the right kind of friction in the right places, and reducing the wrong kind everywhere else. That is how customer experience and fraud can support each other instead of fighting each other. Right.

How to handle C-suite fraud conversations better

This is one of those topics that sounds simple until you are in the room. C-suite fraud conversations are hard because fraud teams often know the risk cold, but leadership is thinking about priorities across the whole business. Revenue. Growth. Customer retention. Investor expectations. Cost pressure. Product velocity. All of it. So if the fraud team walks in talking only about fraud, it can lose the room quickly. That usually creates frustration on both sides. The better approach is fraud leadership communication that connects fraud to what the executive already cares about. Show the business tradeoff. Show the operational cost. Show the customer impact. Show the risk of not acting. And show how better fraud decisions support the company’s larger goals instead of blocking them. That is when the conversation starts getting better.

Why this matters for fraud leaders right now

Honestly, this is one of the biggest leadership issues in fraud. A lot of smart fraud teams are doing good work but still struggling to get the influence they need because they are measured too narrowly or heard too narrowly. That is why I think conversations like this matter. Fraud leaders need to be able to explain their work as part of business performance, not just fraud performance. That is the part that holds up. Gil brings a really useful perspective here because he understands both the mechanics of fraud and the leadership challenge of getting organizations to take the right lesson from it. Not panic. Not overcorrect. Just stop pretending growth and security are enemies. The big takeaway from this episode is pretty straightforward. Fraud ROI becomes much easier to defend when leaders understand that fraud prevention is not just about blocking bad activity. It is about enabling better growth, better trust, and a better customer experience. And that is exactly why growth and security are not mutually exclusive.